Mirena IUD Lawsuit

(Levonorgesterel-Releasing Birth Control Implant)

Problem summary

Mirena IUD lawsuits pending in courts across the country accuse Bayer Pharmaceuticals of manufacturing a defective medical device and intentionally concealing the potential risk of the birth control implant causing devastating side effects in users. Among the possible complications associated with Mirena pregnancy prevention are organ perforation, device migration, abdominal pain and cramping, and a buildup of pressure inside the skull called pseudotumor cerebri.

In the United States, more than two million women have used Mirena IUD since its inception in 2000, and in that time, more than 70,000 adverse event reports have been filed with the FDA, detailing devastating and debilitating complications allegedly caused by the long-term birth control device. Women who have suffered side effects allegedly caused by their Mirena IUD, some of which can occur months or even years after implantation, accuse Bayer Pharmaceuticals of negligence and reckless disregard for public safety.

About Mirena IUD

Mirena intrauterine device (IUD) is a small, T-shaped plastic device inserted into the uterus to provide long-term pregnancy prevention and to treat heavy periods in women. Mirena releases a controlled dose of a hormone called levonorgestrel and is designed to prevent pregnancy for up to five years, by stopping sperm from entering the uterus and fertilizing an egg. The birth control implant is one of the most widely-used IUDs in the United States and is marketed by Bayer Pharmaceuticals as a good birth control alternative for women who prefer not to take oral contraceptives. However, serious concerns have been raised in recent years about Bayer’s failure to adequately warn patients and the medical community about the potential risk of Mirena IUD side effects.

In 2008, the FDA issued a series of safety communications requiring changes to the Mirena IUD label to include the risk of complications like ectopic pregnancy, ovarian cysts, organ perforation and device expulsion. In 2009, the FDA issued a warning letter to Bayer accusing the company of making misleading claims about Mirena’s efficacy. The letter cited the company’s failure to indicate that the birth control implant should only be used for up to five years before being replaced and that it is primarily recommended for use by women who already have at least one child.

In the years since, additional concerns have been raised about the safety of Mirena IUD, and in its January 2018 QuarterWatch report, the Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) reported that there were more than 8,000 adverse event reports associated with Mirena over a two-year period ending in June 2017. At this rate, the Mirena adverse event reports outnumbered those submitted in connection with four other popular birth control methods combined.

Free Confidential Case Review
[ninja_form id=7]

Mirena IUD Side Effects

  • Pseudotumor cerebri (PTC)
  • Intracranial hypertension
  • Papilledema
  • Organ perforation
  • Device migration
  • Abdominal cramping
  • Chronic headaches
  • Pelvic inflammatory disease
  • Infection
  • Ovarian cysts
  • Blurred vision
  • Blindness
  • Severe pain
  • Device expulsion
  • Breast cancer
  • Vaginal bleeding
  • Unintended pregnancy
  • Ectopic pregnancy
  • Miscarriage
  • Infertility
  • Surgery to remove the device
  • Device embedment

Call Now for a Free Mirena IUD Case Review

Mirena IUD and Pseudotumor Cerebri Settlements & Litigation

During its nearly 20 years on the market, Mirena IUD has been the subject of considerable controversy and has been named in enough injury reports that the FDA has increased the birth control device’s warnings and precautions, and thousands of product liability lawsuits have been brought against Bayer Pharmaceuticals over alleged side effects of the birth control implant. These Mirena IUD lawsuits accuse Bayer Pharmaceuticals of selling a dangerous product, failing to provide adequate warnings to women using the birth control implant, and using deceptive advertising to downplay or hide the risk of Mirena complications. In fact, so many product liability lawsuits filed in courts across the country have involved similar allegations against Bayer and Mirena IUD that two federal multi-district litigations (MDLs) were created for the Mirena IUD litigation, one for migration, perforation and embedment injuries and one for pseudotumor cerebri injuries, both centralized in the Southern District of New York. As many as 2,000 other Mirena IUD lawsuits were also centralized as part of a multi-county litigation (MCL) in New Jersey.

Women who have suffered serious side effects allegedly caused by Mirena may be entitled to financial compensation for their medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering and other damages, which they can pursue by filing a product liability lawsuit against Bayer Pharmaceuticals.

Free Case Review

Members of our legal team are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. If you or a loved one would like a free evaluation of your potential case, please give us a call or complete our no obligation case review form.

Recent News & Articles from our Blog

Taxol Weekly More Effective with Fewer Side Effects Than Taxotere Weekly

A recent study found that getting paclitaxel (Taxol) weekly had more benefits than getting paclitaxel​ every 3 weeks for women diagnosed with breast cancer that had spread to the lymph nodes or women diagnosed with breast cancer that hadn’t spread to the lymph nodes...

Court Rules California Can Label Glyphosate as Possible Carcinogen

  A California state appellate court recently backed California’s listing of the widely-used herbicide glyphosate, the primary ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup weed killer, as a possible cause of cancer (it has been widely linked to Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and...